Submissions to the Honourable Chief Justice Helen Bowskill, Chief Justice of Queensland dated 7 October 2025

I. Introduction

1. This submission supports the Supreme Court of Queensland’s ongoing engagement with the judiciary and profession on the use of generative artificial intelligence, following the Guidelines for Judicial Officers on the Use of Generative AI (2025) and the Supreme Court’s Practice Direction No. 5 of 2025 – Accuracy of References in Submissions.
2. The submission aims to illustrate how AI systems can be built to reflect law’s discipline rather than mere probability, producing verifiable and audit-ready outputs.

II. National Baseline Understanding

3. Across jurisdictions, courts have converged on a baseline understanding of generative AI:
   1. LLMs are probabilistic text generators that predict the next word.
   2. They do not reason in a human or legal sense.
   3. They are prone to hallucinations (non-existent cases).
   4. Their processes are opaque (no audit trail).
   5. They conflate fact, inference, and opinion.
   6. Human verification of all citations is essential.