MiAI Law

Submissions to the Honourable Chief Justice Richard Michael Niall, Chief Justice of Victoria dated 7 October 2025

I. Introduction This submission supports the Supreme Court of Victoria’s continuing engagement with the profession and service providers on the responsible use of generative artificial intelligence, following the release of the Guidelines for Litigants: Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Litigation (2024). The submission aims to illustrate how AI systems can be built to reflect […]

MiAI Law Federal Court Submissions on GenAI 4 October 2025

I. Introduction This submission responds to the Federal Court’s Notice to the Profession dated 29 April 2025, which flagged that the Court is considering issuing a practice note or guidelines regarding the use of generative AI. The purpose of this submission is twofold: To set out the baseline understanding of generative AI reflected in guidance […]

Submissions to Justice Mitchell, Supreme Court of Western Australia dated 4 October 2025

I. Introduction This submission responds to the Supreme Court of Western Australia’s Consultation Note on a proposed AI Practice Direction (2025). We commend the Court for its leadership in initiating consultation on this important issue. This submission sets out the national baseline on generative AI use in courts, answers the consultation questions posed, and explains […]

Submissions to the Honourable Chief Justice Lucy McCallum, Chief Justice of Australian Capital Territory dated 7 October 2025

I. Introduction This submission is provided for the information of the Supreme Court of Australian Capital Territory, noting that, as at October 2025, no specific guidance or practice direction has been issued concerning the use of generative artificial intelligence in judicial or professional practice. The purpose of this paper is to summarise national developments in […]